“'The reason is,' said the Gryphon, 'that they would go with the lobsters to the dance. So they got thrown out to sea. So they had to fall a long way. So they got their tails fast in their mouths. So they couldn't get them out again. That's all.'”
I cannot understand how falling a long way results in their tails ending up in their mouths.
I would be so grateful if someone could explain this to me please!
The books > AAIW - The lobster quadrille
- Beautiful Soup
- Honorary member
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:32 pm
- Location: In a hot tureen
- Contact:
Re: AAIW - The lobster quadrille
I believe this is whimsical Wonderland reasoning to describe a real world phenomenon. Apparently, in Carroll's day, whiting were sold and cooked with their bodies twisted into a circle and their tails tucked in at the head end.
From Martin Gardner's Annotated Alice:
I think the reason the Gryphon's explanation makes no sense is because it is in fact nonsense.
From Martin Gardner's Annotated Alice:
"When I wrote that," Carroll is quoted as saying (in Stuart Collingwood's
The Life and Letters of Lewis Carroll , page 402), "I believed that whiting
really did have their tails in their mouths, but I have since been told that
fishmongers put the tail through the eye, not in the mouth at all."
A reader who signed her name only with "Alice" sent me a clipping of
a letter from Craig Claiborne that appeared in The New Yorker (February
15, 1993). He describes a French dish known as merlan en colere or
"whiting in anger," prepared by "twisting the fish into a circle and tying or
otherwise securing the tail in its mouth. It is then deep-fried (not boiled) and
served with parsley, lemon, and tartar sauce. When it is served hot, it has a
distinctly choleric, or irascible, appearance."
I think the reason the Gryphon's explanation makes no sense is because it is in fact nonsense.
Re: AAIW - The lobster quadrille
Many, many thanks for your kind and very helpful post!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Fusionbot and 1 guest